Aristophanes

As imagined by a 19th century illustrator. It may be inferred from jests in the plays, however, that the real Aristophanes was prematurely bald [1]
Extant plays:
The Acharnians 425 BC
The Knights 424 BC
The Clouds 423 BC
The Wasps 422 BC
Peace 421 BC
The Birds 414 BC
Lysistrata 411BC
Thesmophoriazusae 411 BC
The Frogs 405 BC
Ecclesiazusae c.392 BC
Wealth II 388 BC

Aristophanes (Ἀριστοφάνης, ca. 446 – ca. 386 BC), son of Philippus, of the deme Cydathenaus,[2] was a prolific and much acclaimed comic playwright of ancient Athens. Eleven of his forty plays survive virtually complete. These, together with fragments of some of his other plays, provide the only real examples of a genre of comic drama known as Old Comedy, and they are in fact used to define the genre.[3] Also known as the Father of Comedy[4] and the Prince of Ancient Comedy,[5] Aristophanes has been said to recreate the life of ancient Athens more convincingly than any other author.[6] His powers of ridicule were feared and acknowledged by influential contemporaries - Plato[7][8] singled out Aristophanes' play The Clouds as slander contributing to the trial and execution of Socrates although other satirical playwrights[9] had caricatured the philosopher. His second play, The Babylonians (now lost), was denounced by the demagogue Cleon as a slander against the Athenian polis. It is possible that the case was argued in court but details of the trial are not recorded and Aristophanes caricatured Cleon mercilessly in his subsequent plays, especially The Knights. "In my opinion," he says through the Chorus in that play, "the author-director of comedies has the hardest job of all." (κωμῳδοδιδασκαλίαν εῖναι χαλεπώτατον ἔργον ἁπάντων)[10] He is also known for some famous sayings, such as "By words the mind is winged."[11]

Contents

Biography

Theatre of Dionysus, Athens - in Aristophanes' time, the audience probably sat on wooden benches with earth foundations.[12]

Less is known about Aristophanes than about his plays. In fact, his plays are the main source of information about him. It was conventional in Old Comedy for the Chorus to speak on behalf of the author during an address called the 'parabasis' and thus some biographical facts can be got 'straight from the horse's mouth', so to speak. However, these facts relate almost entirely to his career as a dramatist and the plays contain few clear and unambiguous clues about his personal beliefs or his private life.[13] He was a comic poet in an age when it was conventional for a poet to assume the role of 'teacher' (didaskalos), and though this specifically referred to his training of the Chorus in rehearsal, it also covered his relationship with the audience as a commentator on significant issues.[14] Aristophanes claimed to be writing for a clever and discerning audience[15], yet he also declared that 'other times' would judge the audience according to its reception of his plays.[16] He sometimes boasts of his originality as a dramatist[17] yet his plays consistently espouse opposition to radical new influences in Athenian society. He caricatured leading figures in the arts (notably Euripides, whose influence on his own work however he once begrudgingly acknowledged),[18] in politics (especially the populist Cleon), and in philosophy/religion (where Socrates was the most obvious target). Such caricatures seem to imply that Aristophanes was an old-fashioned conservative, yet that view of him leads to contradictions.[19]

The writing of plays was a craft that could be handed down from father to son, and it has been argued that Aristophanes produced plays mainly to entertain the audience and to win prestigious competitions.[20] The plays were written for production at the great dramatic festivals of Athens, the Lenaia and City Dionysia, where they were judged and awarded places relative to the works of other comic dramatists. An elaborate series of lotteries, designed to prevent prejudice and corruption, reduced the voting judges at the City Dionysia to just five in number. These judges probably reflected the mood of the audiences[21] yet there is much uncertainty about the composition of those audiences.[22] They were certainly huge, with seating for at least 10 000 at the Theatre of Dionysus, but it is not certain that they were a representative sample of the Athenian citizenry. The day's program at the City Dionysia for example was crowded, with three tragedies and a 'satyr' play ahead of the comedy, and it is possible that many of the poorer citizens (typically the main supporters of demagogues like Cleon) occupied the festival holiday with other pursuits. (Those inhabitants who were not citizens, such as slaves, were also excluded from the audience.) The conservative views expressed in the plays might therefore reflect the attitudes of a dominant group in an unrepresentative audience. The production process might also have influenced the views expressed in the plays. Throughout most of Aristophanes' career, the Chorus was essential to a play's success and it was recruited and funded by a choregus, a wealthy citizen appointed to the task by one of the archons. A choregus could regard his personal expenditure on the Chorus as a civic duty and a public honour, but Aristophanes showed in The Knights that wealthy citizens could regard civic responsibilities as punishment imposed on them by demagogues and populists like Cleon.[23] Thus the political conservatism of the plays might reflect the views of the wealthiest section of society, on whose generosity comic dramatists depended for the success of their plays.[24]

When Aristophanes' first play The Banqueters was produced, Athens was an ambitious, imperial power and The Peloponnesian War was only in its fourth year. His plays often express pride in the achievement of the older generation (the victors at Marathon)[25][26] yet they are not jingoistic and they are staunchly opposed to the war with Sparta. The plays are particularly scathing in criticism of war profiteers, among whom populists such as Cleon figure prominently.[27][28] By the time his last play was produced (around 386 BC) Athens had been defeated in war, its empire had been dismantled and it had undergone a transformation from the political to the intellectual centre of Greece.[29] Aristophanes was part of this transformation and he shared in the intellectual fashions of the period - the structure of his plays evolves from Old Comedy until, in his last surviving play, Wealth II, it more closely resembles New Comedy. However it is uncertain whether he led or merely responded to changes in audience expectations.[30]

Aristophanes won second prize at the City Dionysia in 427 BC with his first play The Banqueters (now lost). He won first prize there with his next play, The Babylonians (also now lost). It was usual for foreign dignitaries to attend the City Dionysia ,and The Babylonians caused some embarrassment for the Athenian authorities since it depicted the cities of the Athenian League as slaves grinding at a mill.[31] Some influential citizens, notably Cleon, reviled the play as slander against the polis and possibly took legal action against the author. The details of the trial are unrecorded but, speaking through the hero of his third play The Acharnians (staged at the Lenaia, where there were few or no foreign dignitaries), the poet carefully distinguishes between the polis and the real targets of his acerbic wit:

ἡμῶν γὰρ ἄνδρες, κοὐχὶ τὴν πόλιν λέγω,
μέμνησθε τοῦθ᾽ ὅτι οὐχὶ τὴν πόλιν λέγω,
ἀλλ᾽ ἀνδράρια μοχθηρά, παρακεκομμένα...[32]
People among us, and I don't mean the polis,
Remember this - I don't mean the polis -
But wicked little men of a counterfeit kind....

Aristophanes repeatedly savages Cleon in his later plays. But these satirical diatribes appear to have had no effect on Cleon's political career - a few weeks after the performance of The Knights, a play full of anti-Cleon jokes, Cleon was elected to the prestigious board of ten generals.[33] Cleon also seems to have had no real power to limit or control Aristophanes: the caricatures of him continued up to and even beyond his death.

In the absence of clear biographical facts about Aristophanes, scholars make educated guesses based on interpretation of the language in the plays. Inscriptions and summaries or comments by Hellenistic and Byzantine scholars can also provide useful clues. We know however from a combination of these sources,[34] and especially from comments in The Knights[35] and The Clouds,[36] that Aristophanes' first three plays were not directed by him - they were instead directed by Callistratus and Philoneides,[37] an arrangement that seemed to suit Aristophanes since he appears to have used these same directors in many later plays as well (Philoneides for example later directed The Frogs and he was also credited, perhaps wrongly, with directing The Wasps.)[38] Aristophanes's use of directors complicates our reliance on the plays as sources of biographical information since apparent self-references might have been made on behalf of his directors instead. Thus for example a statement by the chorus in The Acharnians[39] seems to indicate that the 'poet' had a close, personal association with the island of Aegina, yet the terms 'poet' (poietes) and 'director' (didaskalos) are often interchangeable since dramatic poets usually directed their own plays and therefore the reference in the play could be either to Aristophanes or Callistratus. Similarly, the hero in The Acharnians complains about Cleon "dragging me into court" over "last year's play"[40] but here again it is not clear if this was was said on behalf of Aristophanes or Callistratus, either of whom might have been prosecuted by Cleon.[41]

Comments made by the Chorus on behalf of Aristophanes in The Clouds[42] have been interpreted as evidence that he can have been hardly more than 18 years old when his first play The Banqueters was produced.[43] The second parabasis in Wasps[44] appears to indicate that he reached some kind of temporary accommodation with Cleon following either the controversy over The Babylonians or a subsequent controversy over The Knights.[45] It has been inferred[46] from statements in The Clouds and Peace that Aristophanes was prematurely bald.[47]

We know that Aristophanes was probably victorious at least once at the City Dionysia (with Babylonians in 427)[48] and at least three times at the Lenaia, with Acharnians in 425, Knights in 424, and Frogs in 405. Frogs in fact won the unique distinction of a repeat performance at a subsequent festival. We know that a son of Aristophanes, Araros, was also a comic poet and he could have been heavily involved in the production of his father's play Wealth II in 388[49]. Araros is also thought to have been responsible for the posthumous performances of the now lost plays Aeolosicon II and Cocalus,[50] and it is possible that the last of these won the prize at the City Dionysia in 387.[51] It appears that a second son, Philippus, was twice victorious at the Lenaia[52] and he could have directed some of Eubulus’ comedies.[53] A third son was called either Nicostratus or Philetaerus,[54] and a man by the latter name appears in the catalogue of Lenaia victors with two victories, the first probably in the late 370s.[55]

Plato's The Symposium appears to be a useful source of biographical information about Aristophanes, but its reliability is open to doubt.[56] It purports to be a record of conversations at a dinner party at which both Aristophanes and Socrates are guests, held some seven years after the performance of The Clouds, the play in which Socrates was cruelly caricatured. One of the guests, Alcibiades, even quotes from the play when teasing Socrates over his appearance[57] and yet there is no indication of any ill-feeling between Socrates and Aristophanes. Plato's Aristophanes is in fact a genial character and this has been interpreted as evidence of Plato's own friendship with him[58] (their friendship appears to be corroborated by an epitaph for Aristophanes, reputedly written by Plato, in which the playwright's soul is compared to an eternal shrine for the Graces).[59] Plato was only a boy when the events in The Symposium are supposed to have occurred and it is possible that his Aristophanes is in fact based on a reading of the plays. For example, conversation among the guests turns to the subject of Love and Aristophanes explains his notion of it in terms of an amusing allegory, a device he often uses in his plays. He is represented as suffering an attack of hiccoughs and this might be a humorous reference to the crude physical jokes in his plays. He tells the other guests that he is quite happy to be thought amusing but he is wary of appearing ridiculous.[60][61] This fear of being ridiculed is consistent with his declaration in The Knights that he embarked on a career of comic playwright warily after witnessing the public contempt and ridicule that other dramatists had incurred.[62]

Aristophanes survived The Peloponnesian War, two oligarchic revolutions and two democratic restorations; this has been interpreted as evidence that he was not actively involved in politics despite his highly political plays.[63] He was probably appointed to the Council of Five Hundred for a year at the beginning of the fourth century but such appointments were very common in democratic Athens.[64] Socrates, in the trial leading up to his own death, put the issue of a personal conscience in those troubled times quite succinctly:

ἀναγκαῖόν ἐστι τὸν τῷ ὄντι μαχούμενον ὑπὲρ τοῦ δικαίου, καὶ εἰ μέλλει ὀλίγον χρόνον σωθήσεσθαι, ἰδιωτεύειν ἀλλὰ μὴ δημοσιεύειν.[65]
"...he who will really fight for the right, if he would live even for a little while, must have a private station and not a public one.[66]

Aristophanes the Poet

Muse reading, Louvre

The language in Aristophanes' plays, and in Old Comedy generally, was valued by ancient commentators as a model of the Attic dialect. The orator Quintilian believed that the charm and grandeur of the Attic dialect made Old Comedy an example for orators to study and follow, and he considered it inferior in these respects only to the works of Homer.[67] [68]A revival of interest in the Attic dialect may have been responsible for the recovery and circulation of Aristophanes' plays during the 4th and 5th centuries AD, resulting in their survival today.[67] In Aristophanes' plays, the Attic dialect is couched in verse and his plays can be appreciated for their poetic qualities.

For Aristophanes' contemporaries the works of Homer and Hesiod were as instructive as the Bible became for many Greeks in the Christian era. Thus poetry had a moral and social significance that made it an inevitable topic of comic satire.[69] Aristophanes was very conscious of literary fashions and traditions and his plays feature numerous references to other poets. These include not only rival comic dramatists such as Eupolis and Hermippus[70] and predecessors such as Magnes, Crates and Cratinus,[71] but also tragedians, notably Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides, all three of whom are mentioned in e.g. The Frogs. Aristophanes was the equal of these great tragedians in his subtle use of lyrics.[72] He appears to have modelled his approach to language on that of Euripides in particular, so much so that the comic dramatist Cratinus labelled him a 'Euripidaristophanist' addicted to hair-splitting niceties.[73]

A full appreciation of Aristophanes' plays requires an understanding of the poetic forms he employed with virtuoso skill, and of their different rhythms and associations.[74] There were three broad poetic forms: iambic dialogue, tetrameter verses and lyrics:[75]

How many are the things that vex my heart!
Pleasures are few, so very few - just four -
But stressful things are manysandthousandsandheaps![77]
Here Aristophanes employs a frequent device, arranging the syntax so that the final word in a line comes as a comic climax.[78] The hero's pleasures are so few he can number them (τέτταρα, four) but his causes for complaint are so many they beggar numerical description and he must invent his own word for them (ψαμμακοσιογάργαρα, literally 'sandhundredheaps', here paraphrased 'manysandthousandsandheaps'). The use of invented compound words is another comic device frequently found in the plays.[79]
Anapestic rhythms are naturally jaunty (as in many limericks) and trochaic metre is suited to rapid delivery (the word 'trochee' is in fact derived from trechein, 'to run', as demonstrated for example by choruses who enter at speed, often in aggressive mood)[80] However, even though both these rhythms can seem to 'bowl along'[81] Aristophanes often varies them through use of complex syntax and substituted metres, adapting the rhythms to the requirements of serious argument. In an anapestic passage in The Frogs, for instance, the character Aeschylus presents a view of poetry that is supposed to be serious but which leads to a comic interruption by the god, Dionysus:
AES.:It was Orpheus singing who taught us religion and how wrong people are when they kill,
And we learned from Musaeus medicinal cures and the science of divination.
If it's farming you want, Hesiod knows it all, when to plant, when to harvest. How godlike
Homer got to be famous, I'll tell if you ask: he taught us what all good men should know,
Discipline, fortitude, battle-readiness. DIO.: But no-one taught Pantocles - yesterday
He was marching his men up and down on parade when the crest of his helmet fell off![82]

The rhythm begins at a typical anapestic gallop, slows down to consider the revered poets Hesiod and Homer, then gallops off again to its comic conclusion at the expense of the unfortunate Pantocles. Such subtle variations in rhythm are common in the plays, allowing for serious points to be made while still whetting the audience's appetite for the next joke.

Though to myself I often seem
A bright chap and not awkward,
None comes close to Amynias,
Son of Sellos of the Bigwig
Clan, a man I once saw
Dine with rich Leogorus.
Now as poor as Antiphon,
He lives on apples and pomegranates
Yet he got himself appointed
Ambassador to Pharselus,
Way up there in Thessaly,
Home of the poor Penestes:
Happy to be where everyone
Is as penniless as he is![85]
The pun here in English translation (Penestes-penniless) is a weak version of the Greek pun Πενέσταισι-πενέστης. Many of the puns in the plays are based on words that are similar rather than identical, and it has been observed that there could be more of them than scholars have yet been able to identify.[86] Sometimes entire scenes are constructed on puns, as in The Acharnians with the Megarian farmer and his pigs.[87]

It can be argued that the most important feature of the language of the plays is imagery, particularly the use of similes, metaphors and pictorial expressions.[88] In 'The Knights', for example, the ears of a character with selective hearing are represented as parasols that open and close.[89] In The Frogs, Aeschylus is said to compose verses in the manner of a horse rolling in a sandpit.[90] Some plays feature revelations of human perfectibility that are poetic rather than religious in character, such as the marriage of the hero Pisthetairos to Zeus's paramour in The Birds and the 'recreation' of old Athens, crowned with roses, at the end of The Knights.

Aristophanes and Old Comedy

Thalia, muse of comedy, gazing upon a comic mask (detail from Muses' Sarcophagus)

The Greek word for 'comedy' (kōmōidía) derives from the words for 'revel' and 'song' (kōmos and ōdē) and according to Aristotle[91] comic drama actually developed from song. The first, official comedy at the City Dionysia was not staged until 487/6 BC,[92] by which time tragedy had already been long established there. The first comedy at the Lenaia was staged later still,[93] only about 20 years before the performance there of The Acharnians, the first of Aristophanes' surviving plays. According to Aristotle, comedy was slow to gain official acceptance because nobody took it seriously[94] yet, only sixty years after comedy first appeared at 'The City Dionysia', Aristophanes observed that producing comedies was the most difficult work of all.[95] Competition at the Dionysian festivals needed dramatic conventions for plays to be judged, but it also fuelled innovations.[96] Developments were quite rapid and Aristotle was able to distinguish between 'old' and 'new' comedy by 330 BC.[97] The trend from Old Comedy to New Comedy saw a move away from highly topical concerns with real individuals and local issues towards generalized situations and stock characters. This was partly due to the internationalization of cultural perspectives during and after the Peloponnesian War.[98][99] For ancient commentators such as Plutarch,[100] New Comedy was a more sophisticated form of drama than Old Comedy. However Old Comedy was in fact a complex and sophisticated dramatic form incorporating many approaches to humour and entertainment.[101] In Aristophanes' early plays, the genre appears to have developed around a complex set of dramatic conventions and these were only gradually simplified and abandoned.

The City Dionysia and the Lenaia were celebrated in honour of Dionysus, a god who represented Man's darker nature (Euripides' play The Bacchae offers the best insight into 5th Century ideas about this god).[102] Old Comedy can be understood as a celebration of the exuberant sense of release inherent in his worship[103] It was more interested in finding targets for satire than in any kind of advocacy.[104] During the City Dionysia, a statue of the god was brought to the theatre from a temple outside the city and it remained in the theatre throughout the festival, overseeing the plays like a privileged member of the audience.[105] In The Frogs, the god appears also as a dramatic character and he enters the theatre ludicrously disguised as Hercules. He observes to the audience that every time he is on hand to hear a joke from a comic dramatist like Phrynichus (one of Aristophanes' rivals) he ages by more than a year.[106] The scene opens the play and it is a reminder to the audience that nobody is above mockery in Old Comedy - not even its patron god and its practitioners! Gods, artists, politicians and ordinary citizens were legitimate targets, comedy was a kind of licensed buffoonery[107] and there was no legal redress for anyone who was slandered in a play.[108] There were some limits to the scope of the satire, but they are not easily defined. Impiety could be punished in 5th century Athens but absurdities implicit in traditional religion were open to ridicule.[109] The polis was not allowed to be slandered but, as stated in the biography section of this article, that could depend on who was in the audience and which festival was involved.

For convenience, Old Comedy, as represented by Aristophanes' early plays, is analysed below in terms of three broad characteristics - topicality, festivity and complexity. Dramatic structure contributes to the complexity of Aristophanes' plays. However it is associated with poetic rhythms and meters that have little relevance to English translations and it is therefore treated in a separate section.

Topicality

Old Comedy's emphasis on real personalities and local issues makes the plays difficult to appreciate today without the aid of scholarly commentaries - see for example articles on The Knights, The Wasps and Peace for lists of topical references. The topicality of the plays had unique consequences for both the writing and the production of the plays in ancient Athens.

Festivity

The Lenaia and City Dionysia were religious festivals, but they resembled a gala rather than a church service.[126]

Complexity

The development of New Comedy involved a trend towards more realistic plots, a simpler dramatic structure and a softer tone.[141] Old Comedy was the comedy of a vigorously democratic polis at the height of its power and it gave Aristophanes the freedom to explore the limits of humour, even to the point of undermining the humour itself.[142]

Dramatic structure

The structural elements of a typical Aristophanic plot can be summarized as follows:

  • prologue - an introductory scene with a dialogue and/or soliloquy addressed to the audience, expressed in iambic trimeter and explaining the situation that is to be resolved in the play;
  • parodos - the arrival of the chorus, dancing and singing, sometimes followed by a choreographed skirmish with one or more actors, often expressed in long lines of tetrameters;
  • symmetrical scenes - passages featuring songs and declaimed verses in long lines of tetrameters, arranged symmetrically in two sections such that each half resembles the other in meter and line length; the agon and parabasis can be considered specific instances of symmetrical scenes:
    • parabasis - verses through which the Chorus addresses the audience directly, firstly in the middle of the play and again near the end (see the section below Parabasis);
    • agon - a formal debate that decides the outcome of the play, typically in anapestic tetrameter, though iambs are sometimes used to delineate inferior arguments;[147]
  • episodes - sections of dialogue in iambic trimeter, often in a succession of scenes featuring minor characters towards the end of a play;
  • songs ('strophes'/'antistrophes' or 'odes'/'antodes') - often in symmetrical pairs where each half has the same meter and number of lines as the other, used as transitions between other structural elements, or between scenes while actors change costume, and often commenting on the action;
  • exodus - the departure of the Chorus and the actors, in song and dance celebrating the hero's victory and sometimes celebrating a symbolic marriage.

The rules of competition did not prevent a playwright arranging and adjusting these elements to suit his particular needs.[148] In The Acharnians and Peace, for example, there is no formal agon whereas in The Clouds there are two agons.

Parabasis

The parabasis is an address to the audience by the Chorus and/or the leader of the Chorus while the actors are leaving or have left the stage. The Chorus in this role speaks sometimes out of character, as the author's mouthpiece, and sometimes in character, but very often it isn't easy to distinguish its two roles. Generally the parabasis occurs somewhere in the middle of a play and often there is a second parabasis towards the end. The elements of a parabasis have been defined and named by scholars but it is probable that Aristophanes' own understanding was less formal.[149] The selection of elements can vary from play to play and it varies considerably within plays between first and second parabasis. The early plays (The Acharnians to The Birds) are fairly uniform in their approach however and the following elements of a parabasis can be found within them.

The Wasps is thought to offer the best example of a conventional approach[151] and the elements of a parabasis can be identified and located in that play as follows.

Elements in The Wasps 1st parabasis 2nd parabasis
kommation lines 1009-14 [19] ---
parabasis proper lines 1015-50 ---
pnigos lines 1051-59 ---
strophe lines 1060-70 lines 1265-74 [20]
epirrhema lines 1071-90 lines 1275-83
antistrophe lines 1091-1101 missing
antepirrhema lines 1102-1121 lines 1284-91

Textual corruption is probably the reason for the absence of the antistrophe in the second parabasis.[152] However, there are several variations from the ideal even within the early plays. For example, the parabasis proper in The Clouds (lines 518-62) is composed in eupolidean meter rather than in anapests[153] and the second parabasis includes a kommation but it lacks strophe, antistrophe and antepirrhema (The Clouds lines 1113-30). The second parabasis in The Acharnians lines 971-99 [21] can be considered a hybrid parabasis/song (i.e. the declaimed sections are merely continuations of the strophe and antistrophe) [154] and, unlike the typical parabasis, it seems to comment on actions that occur on stage during the address. An understanding of Old Comedy conventions such as the parabasis is necessary for a proper understanding of Aristophanes' plays; on the other hand, a sensitive appreciation of the plays is necessary for a proper understanding of the conventions.

Influence and legacy

Aristophanes, the master of Old Comedy, and Menander, the master of New Comedy.

The tragic dramatists, Sophocles and Euripides, died near the end of the Peloponnesian War and the art of tragedy thereafter ceased to develop, yet comedy did continue to develop after the defeat of Athens and it is possible that it did so because, in Aristophanes, it had a master craftsman who lived long enough to help usher it into a new age.[155] Aristophanes seems to have had some appreciation of his formative role in the development of comedy, as indicated by his comment in Clouds that his audience would be judged by other times according to its reception of his plays.[156] Clouds was awarded third (i.e. last) place after its original performance and the text that has come down to the modern age was a subsequent draft that Aristophanes intended to be read rather than acted.[157] The circulation of his plays in manuscript extended their influence beyond the original audience, over whom in fact they seem to have had little or no practical influence: they did not affect the career of Cleon, they failed to persuade the Athenians to pursue an honourable peace with Sparta and it is not clear that they were instrumental in the trial and execution of Socrates, whose death probably resulted from public animosity towards the philosopher's disgraced associates (such as Alcibiades),[158] exacerbated of course by his own intransigence during the trial.[159] The plays, in manuscript form, have been put to some surprising uses - as indicated earlier, they were used in the study of rhetoric on the recommendation of Quintilian and by students of the Attic dialect in the Fourth and Fifth Centuries AD. It is possible that Plato sent copies of the plays to Dionysius of Syracuse so that he might learn about Athenian life and government.[160]

Latin translations of the plays by Andreas Divus (Venice 1528) were circulated widely throughout Europe in the Rennaissance and these were soon followed by translations and adaptations in modern languages. Racine, for example, drew Les Plaideurs (1668) from The Wasps. Goethe (who turned to Aristophanes for a warmer and more vivid form of comedy than he could derive from readings of Terence and Plautus) adapted a short play Die Vögel from The Birds for performance in Weimar. Aristophanes has appealed to both conservatives and radicals in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries - Anatoly Lunacharsky, first Commissar of Enlightenment for the USSR in 1917, declared that the ancient dramatist would have a permanent place in proletarian theatre and yet conservative, Prussian intellectuals interpreted Aristophanes as a satirical opponent of social reform.[161] The avant-gardist stage-director Karolos Koun directed a version of The Birds under the Acropolis in 1959 that established a trend in modern Greek history of breaking taboos through the voice of Aristophanes.[162]

The plays have a significance that goes beyond their artistic function, as historical documents that open the window on life and politics in classical Athens, in which respect they are perhaps as important as the writings of Thucydides. The artistic influence of the plays is immeasurable. They have contributed to the history of European theatre and that history in turn shapes our understanding of the plays. Thus for example the operettas of Gilbert and Sullivan can give us insights into Aristophanes' plays[163] and similarly the plays can give us insights into the operettas.[164]

Listed below is a random and very tiny sample of works influenced (more or less) by Aristophanes.

Drama

Literature

Electronic media

Works

Surviving plays

Most of these are traditionally referred to by abbreviations of their Latin titles; Latin remains a customary language of scholarship in classical studies.

Datable non-surviving (lost) plays

The standard modern edition of the fragments is Kassel-Austin, Poetae Comici Graeci III.2.

Undated non-surviving (lost) plays

Attributed (doubtful, possibly by Archippos)

See also

References

  1. The Frogs and Other Plays David Barrett, Penguin Books 1964, page 9.
  2. Aristophanes: Lysistrata, The Acharnians, The Clouds Alan Sommerstein, Penguin Books 1973, page 9
  3. Aristophanes: Clouds K.J.Dover (ed), Oxford University Press 1970, Intro. page X.
  4. Aristophanes in Performance 421 BC-AD 2007:Peace, Birds and Frogs Edith Hall and Amanda Wrigley, Legenda (Oxford) 2007, page 1
  5. Character Sketches of Romance, Fiction and the Drama, Vol. 1
  6. The Birds and Other plays David Barrett and Alan Sommerstein (eds), Penguin Classics 2003, page 26
  7. The Apology translated by Benjamin Jowett, section 4
  8. Apology, Greek text, edited J Burnet, section 19c
  9. Lysistrata, The Acharnians, The Clouds Alan Sommerstein, Penguin Books 1973, p16
  10. Aristophanis Comoediae Tomus 1, F.W.Hall and W.M.Geldart (eds), Oxford Classical Texts, Knights ln 516
  11. Birds, l.1447-8; quotation as translated in Macmillan Dictionary of Political Quotations
  12. Frogs and Other Plays David Barrett, Penguin Classics 1964, page 21
  13. Greek Comedy and Ideology David Konstan, Oxford University Press US 1995, page 6
  14. Aristophanes: The Clouds K.J.Dover, Oxford University Press 1970, Intro. page XIV
  15. Aristophanis Comoediae Tomus 1, F.W.Hall and W.M.Geldart (eds), Oxford Classical Texts,Clouds 520-25
  16. Aristophanis Comoediae Tomus 1, F.W.Hall and W.M.Geldart (eds), Oxford Classical Texts,Clouds 560-62
  17. Wasps 1536-7 Wikisource original Greek, Clouds 545-48, Peace 739-58
  18. The Birds and Other Plays by Aristophanes David Barrett and Alan Sommerstein, Penguin Classics 2003, page 9
  19. Greek Society Antony Andrewes, Pelican Books, 1981, pages 247-48
  20. Aristophanes: Lysistrata, The Acharnians, The Clouds A.H. Sommerstein (ed), Penguin Books 1975, page9, footnote
  21. Aristophanes:The Frogs and Other Plays David Barrett (ed), Penguin Classics 1964, page 26
  22. Aristophanes:The Frogs and Other Plays David Barrett (ed), Penguin Classics 1964, page 25
  23. Aristophanis Comoediae Tomus 1, F.W.Hall and W.M.Geldart (eds), Oxford Classical Texts, The Knights lines 911-25
  24. W.Rennie, The Acharnians of Aristophanes, Edward Arnold (London, 1909), page 7, reproduced by Bibliolife
  25. Wasps 1075-1101 Wikisource original Greek [1], Knights 565-576
  26. Acharnians Wikisource Greek text [2] 692-700
  27. Wasps 669-677 Wikisource original Greek [3]; Knights 438-39, 833-35, 864-67; Peace 1210-64; Birds 1410-65
  28. The Acharnians, Wikisource [4] lines 910-58
  29. Aristophanes: Lysistrata, The Acharnians, The Clouds A.H.Sommerstein (ed), Penguin Books 1975, pp 13-14
  30. Aristophanes: The Frogs and Other Plays David Barrett (ed), Penguin Classics 1964, page 12
  31. 'Greek Drama' P.Levi in The Oxford History of the Classical World J.Boardman, J.Griffin, O.Murray (eds), Oxford University Press 1986, page 177
  32. The Acharnians, Wikisource [5] lines 515-17
  33. The Birds and Other Plays by Aristophanes David Barrett and Alan Sommerstein (eds), Penguin Classics 2003, page 34
  34. D.Welsh, IG ii2 2343, Philonides and Aristophanes' Banqueters, Classical Quarterly 33 (1983)
  35. Knights 512-14
  36. Clouds 530-33
  37. Ian Storey, General Introduction, in Clouds, Wasps, Birds By Aristophanes, Peter Meineck (translator), Hackett Publishing 1998, page xiii
  38. Douglas MacDowell, Aristophanes Wasps, Oxford University Press (1971), n.32 page 124
  39. The Acharnians Wikisource original Greek [6] lns 652-54
  40. Acharnians Wikisource original Greek [7] 377-82
  41. W.Rennie, The Acharnians of Aristophanes, Edward Arnold (London, 1909), page 12-15, reproduced by Bibliolife
  42. Aristophanis Comoediae Tomus 1, F.W.Hall and W.M.Geldart (eds), Oxford Classical Texts, The Clouds lns 528-32
  43. Aristophanes: Lysistrata, The Acharnians, The Clouds Alan Sommerstein (ed), Penguin Classics 1975, page 9
  44. Wasps Wikisource original Greek [8] lines 1265-91
  45. Aristophanes:Wasps Douglas MacDowell (ed), Oxford University Press 1978, page 299
  46. Aristophanes: The Frogs and Other Plays David Barrett (ed), Penguin Books 1964, page 9
  47. Aristophanis Comoediae Tomus 1, F.W. Hall and W.M. Geldart (eds), Oxford Classical Texts, Clouds 540-45, Peace 767-74
  48. IG II2 2325. 58
  49. Aristophanes, testimonium 1, lines 54-56, in Kassel-Austin, Poetae Comici Graeci vol. III.2 (Berlin 1984), p. 4.
  50. Aristophanes, Κώκαλος, testimonium iii, in Kassel-Austin, Poetae Comici Graeci vol. III.2 (Berlin 1984), p. 201.
  51. IG II2 2318. 196
  52. IG II2 2325. 140
  53. Eubulus, testimonium 4, in Kassel-Austin, Poetae Comici Graeci vol. V (Berlin 1986), p. 188.
  54. Clouds Peter Meineck (translator) and Ian Storey (Introduction), Hackett Publishing 2000, page XVIII
  55. IG II2 2325. 143 (just after Anaxandrides and just before Eubulus)
  56. Aristophanes:Clouds K.J.Dover (ed), Oxford University Press 1970, Intro. page IX note 1.
  57. Symposium 221B; Plato Vol.3, Loeb Classical Library (1975), page 236
  58. Aristophanes: Lysistrata, The Acharnians, The Clouds Alan Sommerstein (ed), Penguin Books 1973, page10
  59. The Birds and Other Plays David Barrett and Alan Sommerstein (eds), Penguin Classics 2003, page10
  60. The Symposium original Greek text:[9] section 189b
  61. The Symposium (English translation) Benjamin Jowett [10] (scroll half way down).
  62. Aristophanis Comoediae Tomus 1, F.W.Hall and W.M.Geldart (eds), Knights ln 507-550
  63. Aristophanes: Clouds K.J. Dover (ed), Oxford University Press 1970, Introduction page IX
  64. Aristophanes: The Birds and Other Plays D. Barrett and A. Sommerstein (eds),Penguin Classics 2003, page 7
  65. Wikisource, Plato's Apology, John Burnet (ed)[11] section 32a
  66. Plato's Apology, Benjamin Jowett (trans)s:Apology (Plato)#23 (section23).
  67. 67.0 67.1 The Orator's Training Quintilian 10.1.65-6, cited in The Birds and Other Plays by Aristophanes David Barrett and Alan Sommersteinn (eds), Penguin Classics 2003, page 15
  68. Quintilian 10.1.65-6 10.1.61
  69. The Frogs and Other Plays David Barrett (ed), Penguin Classics 1964, pages 151-52
  70. Aristophanis Comoediae Tomus 1, F.W.Hall and W.M.Geldart (eds), Oxford Classical Texts, Clouds lns 553-54
  71. Aristophanis Comoediae Tomus 1, F.W. Hall and W.M. Geldart (eds), Oxford Classical Texts, Knights lns 519-40
  72. The Frogs and Other Plays David Barrett, Penguin Classics 1964, page 30
  73. The Birds and Other Plays by Aristophanes David Barrett and Alan Sommerstein (eds), Penguin Classics 2003, page 9
  74. Aristophanes Wasps Douglas MacDowell (ed), Oxford University Press 1978, page 21
  75. Birds and Other Plays David Barrett and Alan Sommerstein (eds), Penguin Classics 2003, pages 7-8
  76. Birds and Other Plays David Barrett and Alan Sommerstein (eds), Penguin Classics 2003, page 27; Aristophanes Wasps Douglas MacDowell (ed), Oxford University Press 1978, page 16
  77. Original Greek, Wikisource The Acharnians [12] lines 1-3
  78. Aristophanes Wasps Douglas MacDowell (ed), Oxford University Press 1978, page17
  79. Aristophanes Wasps Douglas MacDowell (ed), Oxford University Press 1978, page13; Aristophanes:Lysistrata, The Acharnians, The Clouds Alan Sommerstein, Penguin Classics 1973, page 37
  80. L.P.E. Parker, The Songs of Aristophanes, Oxford, 1997, p. 36
  81. 81.0 81.1 Birds and Other Plays David Barrett and Alan Sommerstein (eds), Penguin Classics 2003, page 27
  82. Aristophanis Comoediae Tomus 2, F.W.Hall and W.M.Geldart (eds), Oxford Classical Texts, Frogs lns 1032-38
  83. Greek Drama, Peter Levi, in The Oxford History of the Classical World edited by J. Boardman, J. Griffin and O. Murray, Oxford University Press 1986, page 175
  84. 84.0 84.1 Aristophanes Wasps Douglas MacDowell (ed), Oxford University Press 1978, page 27
  85. Aristophanes Wasps Douglas MacDowell, Oxford University Press 1978, lines 1265-74: Wikisource: [13]
  86. Birds and Other Plays David Barrett and Alan Sommerstein (eds), Penguin Classics 2003, page 21
  87. The Acharnians Wikisource original Greek [14] lns 729-835
  88. Aristophanes Wasps Douglas MacDowell, Oxford University Press 1978, page 17
  89. Aristophanis Comoediae Tomus 1, F.W. Hall and W.M. Geldart (eds), Oxford Classical Texts, Knights lns 1347-48;
  90. The Frogs lines 902-4
  91. The Poetics 1449a11, Wikisource English translation s:The Poetics#IV section IV
  92. Clouds translated by Peter Meineck with introduction by Ian Storey, Hackett Publishing 2000, page IX
  93. ibid page XIX
  94. The Poetics 1448b38 - 1449b, Wikisource English translation s:The Poetics#V section V
  95. Aristophanis Comoediae Tomus 1, F.W. Hall and W.M. Geldart (eds), Oxford Classical Texts, Knights ln 516
  96. Aristophanes:The Frogs and Other Plays David Barrett, Penguin Classics 1964, page 12
  97. Nichomachean Ethics 1128a 21-24
  98. Aristophanes D. Slavitt and P. Bovie (eds), University of Pennsylvania Press 1999, page XIV
  99. Clouds translated by P. Meineck with introduction by I. Storey, Hackett Publishing 2000, page VIII
  100. Comparison of Aristophanes and Menander
  101. Clouds translated by P.Meineck with introduction by I.Storey, Hackett Publishing 2000, page VII
  102. Clouds P.Meineck (translator) and I.Storey (Introduction), Hackett Publishing 2000, page VIII
  103. Clouds P.Meineck (translator) and I.Storey (Introduction), Hackett Publishing 2000, page XIX
  104. Greek Society Antony Andrewes, Pelican Books 1981, page 247
  105. Aristophanes: Lysistrata, The Acharnians, The Clouds A.Sommerstein, Penguin Classics 1975, page 18
  106. Frogs Wikisource English translation s:The Frogs; original Greek text [15] lines 12-18
  107. Greek Society Antony Andrewes, Pelican Books 1981, page 248
  108. Aristophanes: The Frogs and Other Plays David Barrett, Penguin Classics 1964, page 27
  109. Aristophanes: Lysistrata, The Acharnians, Clouds A. Sommerstein, Penguin Classics 1975, page 17
  110. Aristophanes: Lysistrata, The Acharnians, Clouds A. Sommerstein, Penguin Classics 1975, page 31
  111. Knights lines 230-33
  112. Peace 821-23
  113. The Acharnians Wikisource original Greek [16] lines 1224-25
  114. "Greek Drama" Peter Levi in The Oxford History of the Classical World J.Boardman, J. Griffin and O. Murray (eds), Oxford University Press 1986, page 176
  115. Clouds lines 528-33
  116. Acharnians lines 646-51
  117. Aristophanes:Lysistrata, The Acharnians, The Clouds A.Sommerstein, Penguin Classics 1973, pages 18-19
  118. e.g. Knights lines 997-1095; Birds lines 959-91
  119. e.g. Clouds lines 263-66, Frogs lines 891-94
  120. Acharnians lines 1097-1142 lines
  121. Knights lines 551-64 and 581-594
  122. Knights lines 1321-38
  123. e.g. Peace lines 551-97
  124. Frogs lines 686-705
  125. Aristophanes: Clouds K.J. Dover (ed), Oxford University Press 1970, pages XIII-XIV
  126. Aristophanes: Clouds K.J. Dover, Oxford University Press 1970, page XV
  127. "Greek Drama" Peter Levi in The Oxford History of the Classical World, Oxford University Press 1986, page 175
  128. The Acharnians Wikisource original Greek lines 1164-73
  129. Aristophanes: Lysistrata, The Acharnians, The Clouds A. Sommerstein, Penguin Classics, pages 243-4, notes 69,80,81
  130. Aristophanes: The Frogs and Other Plays David Barrett, Penguin Classics 1964, pages 14-15
  131. Aristophanes: Lysistrata, The Acharnians, The Clouds A. Sommerstein, Penguin Classics, page 23
  132. The Acharnians lines 280-301 Wikisource original Greek [17]; Knights lines 247-72; Wasps lines 452-460 Wikisource original Greek [18]
  133. Aristophanes: The Frogs and Other Plays David Barrett, Penguin Classics 1964, page 9
  134. Aristophanes: Wasps Douglas MacDowell (ed), Oxford University Press 1978, page 14-15
  135. Aristophanes: Lysistrata, The Acharnians, The Clouds A. Sommerstein, Penguin Classics, page 29
  136. Frogs lines 45-47
  137. Aristophanes: Wasps Douglas MacDowell, Oxford University Press 1978, page 7
  138. Aristophanes: Lysistrata, The Acharnians, The Clouds A. Sommerstein, Penguin Classics, pages 33-34
  139. Aristophanes' Old-and-new Comedy Kenneth J.Reckford, UNC Press 1987, page 15
  140. Aristophanes: The Frogs and Other Plays David Barrett, Penguin Classics 1964, pages 13-14
  141. Aristophanes D. Slavitt and P. Bovie (eds), University of Pennsylvania Press 1999, page XIII
  142. Aristophanes and the Definition of Comedy M.S.Silk, Oxford University Press 2002, page 418
  143. Aristophanes: Clouds K.J.Dover, Oxford University Press 1970, page XIII
  144. Aristophanes: Wasps Douglas MacDowell, Oxford University Press 1978, page 12
  145. Clouds Peter Meineck (translator) and Ian Storey (Introduction), Hackett Publishing 2000, page VIII
  146. Aristophanes: The Frogs and other Plays David Barrett (ed), Penguin Classics 1964, page 17
  147. Aristophanes:Wasps D.MacDowell (ed.), Oxford University Press 1971, page 207 note 546-630
  148. Aristophanes: Lysistrata, The Acharnians, The Clouds A. Sommerstein, Penguin Classics 1975, page 27
  149. Aristophanes: Wasps Dougles MacDowell, Oxford University Press 1978, page 261
  150. Aristophanes: Clouds K.J. Dover (ed), Oxford University Press 1970, page 126
  151. Aristophanes:Wasps Douglas M.MacDowell, Oxford University Press 1978, note 1283 page 298
  152. Aristophanes Wasps Douglas MacDowell (ed), Oxford University Press 1978, pages 298-99
  153. Aristophanes:Clouds K.J.Dover, Oxford University Press 1970, page 119 note 518-62
  154. Comedy E.Handley in 'The Cambridge History of Classical Literature I' P.Easterling, R. MacGregor Walker Knox, E.Kenney (eds), page 360
  155. "Greek Drama" Peter Levi, in The Oxford History of the Classical World J. Boardman, J. Griffin and O. Murray (eds), Oxford University Press 1986, page 176
  156. Clouds lines 560-62
  157. Aristophanes: Clouds K.J.Dover, Oxford University Press 1970, pages XXIX-XXX
  158. Aristophanes: Clouds K.J. Dover, Oxford University Press 1970, pages XIV-XV
  159. Plato's Apology, Benjamin Jowett (trans), Wikisource copy:s:Apology (Plato)#33 (section 33)
  160. Clouds Peter Meineck (translator) and Ian Storey (Introduction), Hackett Publishing 2000, page X
  161. Aristophanes in Performance 421 BC-AD 2007:Peace, Birds and Frogs Edith Hall and Amanda Wrigley, Legenda (Oxford) 2007, pages 9-12
  162. Politics and Aristophanes: watchword Caution! by Gonda Van Steen in 'The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Theatre' Marianne McDonald and J.Michael Walton (eds) , Cambridge University Press 2007, page 109
  163. e.g. Aristophanes: Lysistrata, The Acharnians, The Clouds A. Sommerstein, Penguin Classics 1975, page 37
  164. "W.S. Gilbert: A Mid-Victorian Aristophanes" in W.S. Gilbert: A Century of Scholarship and Commentary, John Bush Jones (ed), New York University Press 1970
  165. Note on Oedipus Tyrannus by Mrs Shelley, quoted in Shelley: Poetical Works Thomas Hutchinson (ed), Oxford University Press 1970, page 410

Further reading

  • reviewed by W.J. Slater, Phoenix, Vol. 30, No. 3 (Autumn, 1976), pp. 291-293 doi:10.2307/1087300

External links